dancull

About   


Every Year, JSTOR Turns Away 150 Million Attempts to Read Journal Articles →

elitc:

The way I see it, that’s 150 million chances lost to improve the quality of the Internet. JSTOR, as the keeper of so much great scholarly work, should be one of the Internet’s dominant suppliers of facts and serious research. But if something is not publicly available, key gatekeepers like journalists and Wikipedians, move to the best available source, even if they know that there probably is a better source behind JSTOR’s paywall. So, instead, JSTOR’s vast troves of valuable information remain within academia and the broader Internet’s immune system is that much weaker.

Destroy the publishing-industrial-complex!

(Source: abbyjean, via elitc)

— 4 months ago with 64 notes
  1. paternity--testing reblogged this from abbyjean
  2. emilykarrot reblogged this from rememo and added:
    I’m dreading the day I lose my rights to use JSTOR. The fact is though, servers cost money. JSTOR doesn’t have ads on...
  3. lalibertarienne reblogged this from derosnecnu and added:
    What I find worst with JSTOR, is the fact they block content to students by charing an exorbitant price. Not all school...
  4. derosnecnu reblogged this from sociopoliticaldribble
  5. rememo reblogged this from aerialcircus
  6. dancull reblogged this from elitc
  7. elitc reblogged this from abbyjean and added:
    Destroy the publishing-industrial-complex!
  8. aerialcircus reblogged this from abbyjean
  9. exhibitnumber1 reblogged this from abbyjean
  10. sociopoliticaldribble reblogged this from abbyjean
  11. decanted reblogged this from abbyjean and added:
    Here is a university library’s effort to make as many of those peer-reviewed writings free to the public. I really like...
  12. ocean-bright-wine reblogged this from abbyjean and added:
    Of course, it isn’t really up to JSTOR since they pay journals for the rights to distribute content owned by those...
  13. kalemason reblogged this from abbyjean
  14. abbyjean posted this